Indian Burial and Sacred Grounds Watch

homemission
siteslearnactionlinkscontact

Subjects

Active cases

Closed cases

Wall of Shame

Please inform the webmaster of any broken links!

Sites in Need of Protection

Porter, Indiana

Landfill rejection appealed May 3, 2002

http://www.post-trib.com/cgi-bin/pto-story/news/z1/05-03-02_z1_news_2.html
Post-Tribune (Gary)

By Tim Zorn / Post-Tribune staff writer

Nearly 2,000 people will get personal notices soon of the latest development in the fight over a proposed landfill near Boone Grove. The landfill's developers filed a court case this week, asking a judge to overturn a Porter County Board of Zoning Appeals decision against the waste site. The first hearing before Porter Superior Court Judge Thomas W. Webber will be at 9 a.m. May 14. The issues -- whether the BZA acted properly in making its decision -- will be debated at a later hearing, attorneys said. The appeal by Porter Development, a Chesterton-based company, was expected. "The BZA based their decision on sentiment and opinion and not on fact," Porter Development attorney Todd Leeth said Thursday. Porter Development -- identified as a Lake County trust in its original petition and on the court filing -- wants to build a garbage landfill on 353 acres just east of Boone Grove. The BZA unanimously denied Porter Development's zoning petition on April 2, saying the landfill would harm nearby properties, a school and ancient burial mounds. An estimated 2,000 people -- nearly all of them opposed to the landfill -- attended the board's Feb. 27 hearing on the issue. Soon, everyone who signed up to speak at the hearing, or wrote letters to the BZA against the landfill, or signed the first three lines on each petition against the landfill, will get notices that Porter Development has filed the appeal. A total of 1,999 names were filed with the county clerk's office. Those notices are not court summonses and the people who get them are not defendants in the case, Leeth noted. However, state law requires the petitioner to notify everyone who opposed the zoning petition. The BZA, its members and the county are the only defendants named, but other groups could join the defendants' group. "We're going to fight this thing," said Dan Whitten, an attorney for Porter Residents Opposing Unhealthy Dumps. "It would be unfair to expect the county to do this themselves." He also disputed Leeth's contention that the BZA acted arbitrarily. "I think there was a great deal of evidence that gave the board a plethora of reasons for denying this," he said. To raise money for its legal expenses, P.R.O.U.D. will have a fish fry -- along with a bake sale and raffle -- from 4 to 8 p.m. Saturday at Boone Grove Middle School. The requested donation is $7 for adults and $4 for children. Most of P.R.O.U.D.'s lawyers have not charged for their work, Whitten said earlier this week, but the group expects more expenses. And if the BZA's decision is overturned in court and Porter Development applies for a state permit to build the landfill, P.R.O.U.D. will want "the best environmental lawyers down there >that money can buy," he said.

Return to Porter page



home : mission : updates : sites : learn : action : links : contact



Disclaimer

The IBSGWATCH web site is intended to enhance access to and dissemination of information on causes concerned with Indian burial and sacred grounds. The goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will correct them.

IBSGWATCH is an outgrowth of IBGAG but is independent and not affiliated with any particular group or organization mentioned on these pages. Burial and Sacred Grounds issues on this site are addressed by a variety of organizations and groups; this does not infer or imply any affiliation between the different organizations and groups listed unless explicitly stated. The opinions stated and actions taken by various groups are not necessarily shared or supported by IBSGWATCH or other groups and organizations connected with burial and sacred ground issues presented on this site.


Best viewed at screen resolutions 1024 x 768 and 800 x 600
Copyright Information
For site problems contact the webmaster