Indian Burial and Sacred Grounds Watch

homemission
siteslearnactionlinkscontact

Subjects

Active cases

Closed cases

Wall of Shame

Please inform the webmaster of any broken links!

Sites in Need of Protection

Ocmulgee National Monument, Macon County, Georgia

Go to Ocmulgee main page

Update: 2002 March 25

The following is in from Linday Holliday:

Posted on Mon, Mar. 25, 2002

Monument in danger, group says Ocmulgee park on list of most-threatened properties

By Christopher Schwarzen
Telegraph Staff Writer

Normally, Jim David would love to see his facility listed next to well-known Yellowstone National Park, Mojave National Preserve or Big Cypress National Preserve.

But when it's a partial list of the 10 most-endangered National Park Service properties for 2002 to be announced today by the National Parks Conservation Association, the superintendent of the Ocmulgee National Monument looks at the list with dread.

The reason for the listing, according to the conservation association, a lobbying group for the national park system, isn't anything David or his staff have done.

Instead, the group says the monument is threatened by the planned extension of the Fall Line Freeway through the Ocmulgee Old Fields, property that has often been considered a future extension of the park's boundaries.

"The initial authorization for the park that was signed in 1934 talked about a park of 2,000 acres. We're at 702 acres now," David said. "Although we have never been able to find a map of what exactly was envisioned in legislation, there's always been talk they meant Lamar Mound and the Old Fields."

Lamar Mound has since been acquired by the National Park Service, but it and the main property are separated by more than 1,000 acres called the Ocmulgee Old Fields. One optional route of the freeway splits the Old Fields, now in private ownership, in half.

This proposed route - from the end of Eisenhower Parkway, which now dead-ends overlooking the Old Fields, to Interstate 16 - is the most-often-talked-about option for linking the highway joining Columbus, Macon and Augusta. Proponents of the highway say the road will do much to improve the region's economy.

Although state transportation officials say they no longer have a preferred route, for years the proposal has been considered the easiest to build, at about $100 million. Now state officials say they will be ready to make new route suggestions in November to federal officials, who must sign off on the project, following the completion of an environmental impact statement already sent back to the state once.

The push from local and state legislators to build the Fall Line Freeway connection in Macon continues to increase, with Gov. Roy Barnes saying once again this year he's pushing for its completion. The project is more than 10 years old.

But if built, says Jennifer Stephens of the National Parks Conservation Association, the Ocmulgee National Monument will lose twice.

"A roadway going through the Old Fields would affect how people would perceive the Ocmulgee National Monument," she said. You'd hear the rumblings and see it from the mound."

It would also end any possibility of adding more land to the property that has a recorded history of human activity dating back more than 12,000 years, she said. The Old Fields were recently listed by the Keeper of the National Historic Register as Traditional Cultural Property of the Muscogee Indians, who are believed to have officially formed their nation on the banks of the Ocmulgee River.

The federal designation is the only of its kind east of the Mississippi River, and the Muscogee Nation opposes any road extension through the area.

Part of the Old Fields area is waiting for inclusion in the National Park Service. Known as the Scott McCall Archeological Preserve, the 300 acres is owned by the Archeological Conservancy.

"The property was donated to us by the Scott McCall family in 1995," said Alan Gruber, Southeastern regional director of the conservancy.

"Their intent was to donate it to us so we could transfer it to the National Park Service."

Because of the debate over the Fall Line Freeway extension, which would split the McCall property if built there, the National Park Service wanted a congressional order accepting the property. According to David, the National Park Service didn't want to become involved in the middle of a decision that had become hotly contested politically.

"That's where the hold-up is," Gruber said. "Although the congressional delegation hasn't taken a stand on where the road should be built, they want it built first."

Most people have looked to U.S. Rep. Saxby Chambliss, R-Moultrie, as the broker. His office says it has never been contacted with an official request to begin legislation that would transfer the McCall property to the National Park Service or to find funds to purchase the remainder of the Old Fields.

"Saxby is completely aware of the property there and the Fall Line debate," said Michelle Hitt, a Chambliss spokeswoman. "If that's something they are interested in, they need to ask us. Saxby says he is willing to meet with them."

Those are the kind of words Stephens likes to hear, she said. The National Parks Conservation Association says adding a park to its endangered list is primarily so a discussion about its problems can begin, and hopefully, a solution created in the end.

"I think a good example is last year's Stones River National Battlefield (in Tennessee)," she said. "It was listed because of a road that was proposed to be built through the center of the park. All the parties came together (following the listing) and figured a way to reroute this."

The battlefield is being removed from the endangered list this year, along with other 2001 listings: Biscayne National Park, Fla.; a number of Alaska's national parks; Frederick Douglass National Historic Site, Washington, D.C.; Fire Island National Seashore, N.Y.; and Petrified Forest National Park, Ariz.

As a National Park Service official, David is limited in what he can publicly say about the Fall Line debate, he said. But Jack Sammons, a Mercer University law professor and member of both the Friends of the Ocmulgee Old Fields and the Ocmulgee National Monument Association, says no one is opposed to extending the Fall Line Freeway through Macon. It just shouldn't be through the Old Fields, he said.

"A lot of people's grandparents worked hard in the 1930s to protect this area, but they couldn't come up with all the money to buy the land," Sammons said. "It's still possible, and folks here are working on that project."

Sammons says Chambliss and others could be more proactive in the endeavor, adding that the national attention from the conservation association could be the necessary spur.

"I'm not surprised the Ocmulgee National Monument made their list," he said. "This could be positive in the fact that it will make it easier to acquire funds to purchase lands for future incorporation, and maybe it's an additional incentive for those backing routes bisecting the Old Fields to look again.

"It just requires creative, imaginative thinking."

To contact Christopher Schwarzen, call 744-4213 or e-mail cschwarzen@macontel.com. http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/2928968.htm

Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine of international copyright law.



home : mission : updates : sites : learn : action : links : contact



Disclaimer

The IBSGWATCH web site is intended to enhance access to and dissemination of information on causes concerned with Indian burial and sacred grounds. The goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will correct them.

IBSGWATCH is an outgrowth of IBGAG but is independent and not affiliated with any particular group or organization mentioned on these pages. Burial and Sacred Grounds issues on this site are addressed by a variety of organizations and groups; this does not infer or imply any affiliation between the different organizations and groups listed unless explicitly stated. The opinions stated and actions taken by various groups are not necessarily shared or supported by IBSGWATCH or other groups and organizations connected with burial and sacred ground issues presented on this site.


Best viewed at screen resolutions 1024 x 768 and 800 x 600
Copyright Information
For site problems contact the webmaster