Indian Burial and Sacred Grounds Watch

homemission
siteslearnactionlinkscontact

Subjects

Sites in need of protection:
Active cases
Inactive cases

Cases closed:
Successful outcomes
Wall of Shame

Please inform the webmaster of any broken links!

Sites in Need of Protection

Warm Mineral Springs, North Port, Florida

Return to Warm Mineral Springs page

NORTH PORT
City reapproving four annexations to thwart county
10/17/00
By Jeff Scullin
Herald-Tribune Newscoast

The North Port City Commission began the process Monday of reapproving four controversial annexations it approved last month, in an attempt to stave off a legal challenge by Sarasota County.

County officials decided to challenge North Port's annexation of the 7,700-acre Taylor Ranch, partly on the grounds that public hearings had not been properly advertised.

Monday's meeting seemed more about undermining the county's legal standing than reconsidering the merits of Taylor Ranch and the River Road Office Park, Warm Mineral Springs and Glawson/Carlton annexations.

Community Development Director Sam Jones spent little of his presentations reviewing the proposed annexations. Instead, he made a point of addressing the county's specific concerns -- that previous advertisements did not indicate that public hearings would be held in the City Commission chambers and that an accompanying land map was unclear. Jones submitted into the record certified mail receipts of agenda packets mailed to Sarasota and Charlotte counties and proof that Monday's meeting had been legally advertised. The commissioners unanimously approved on first reading the Taylor Ranch, Warm Mineral Springs and Glawson/Carlton annexations. The city's Planning and Zoning Board will consider the annexations Thursday, and the City Commission will approve or deny the annexation requests Oct. 30.

The commissioners postponed the first reading of the River Road office Park annexation to Oct. 30 after developers said they needed more time to resolve minor technical issues.

The votes seemed strictly procedural for the commissioners, too.

"I haven't changed my mind," Commissioner Rue Berryman said of the Taylor Ranch annexation. "In fact, I think it's been reinforced."

Several even poked fun at county officials, noting that previous public hearings had been packed and had included county officials, who did not attend Monday's meeting.

"City Hall's been here for 25 years and (assistant county attorney Alan) Roddy seemed to find it very easily," Chairman Joe Fink said.

Noting Roddy's absence, Fink quipped: "He must have lost his way."

Reapproving the annexations seemed neither procedural nor amusing to a small contingent who showed up Monday to oppose them, however. "We don't need any more houses," former commissioner Althea "Buddy" Hughes said of the Taylor Ranch annexation. "We've got enough houses."

"The idea for annexation is to bring industry here...I think (this is) just urban sprawl."

The most vocal opposition came in response to the proposed Warm Mineral Springs annexation by a small contingent of American Indian Movement members, who object to any development on what they consider sacred ground. It is the site of some of North America's oldest human archaeological finds.

"You may think it'll put North Port on the map, but if you develop those burial sites we will come down here and wipe North Port off the map," said Sheridan Murphy, executive director of the Florida chapter of the American Indian Movement. "We will use any means necessary to defend that burial site. If we have to go to court we will do that. If we have to talk to these guys, we will do that. If we have to occupy the site we will do that."

Herald-Tribune Newscoast




Information submitted by Tom Scott
Southern Regional Support Coordinator
American Indian Movement of Florida
http://www.geocities.com/aim_sfsg/



home : mission : updates : sites : learn : action : links : contact



Disclaimer

The IBSGWATCH web site is intended to enhance access to and dissemination of information on causes concerned with Indian burial and sacred grounds. The goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will correct them.

IBSGWATCH is an outgrowth of IBGAG but is independent and not affiliated with any particular group or organization mentioned on these pages. Burial and Sacred Grounds issues on this site are addressed by a variety of organizations and groups; this does not infer or imply any affiliation between the different organizations and groups listed unless explicitly stated. The opinions stated and actions taken by various groups are not necessarily shared or supported by IBSGWATCH or other groups and organizations connected with burial and sacred ground issues presented on this site.


Best viewed at screen resolutions 1024 x 768 and 800 x 600
Copyright Information
For site problems contact the webmaster